>no one but an actual fag or a woman views /ss/ that way
So, 100% of the consumers of /ss/?
>is focused on the woman, while sissyshit is fundamentally narcissistic and focused on the sissy.
>the two have almost nothing in common beyond unmanly men
So beyond the literal definition? SS is entirely focused on the shota, to the degree where there isn't even a line drawn between SS with mature women or SS with lolis. If it wasn't they wouldn't be drawn, just like in conventional porn where the men are so abstracted that they're drawn as silhouettes half the time.
>Now stop calling getting off to women gay before you make an even bigger fool of yourself.
I never called getting off to women gay, retard. I called getting off to little boys gay.
>t. used to be into hypnosis and saw it overran with sissies and trannies
lol
not really helping your case here faggot
>>465
>If it's sissification, it's subtle like all porn is in general.
It's self-inserting as a "little girl (with a dick)". I really don't feel like it's that subtle.