>>8101
>open source
I'm sceptical of the "open source" claim used so often. First someone needs tp think about reading it, then have enough knowledge to understand everything in it, then notice anything weird, then tell other people about it without getting censored or ignored. There's plenty of room for things to slip and keep slipping.
>Lastly, it would be pushed much harder if three letter agencies benefited from it.
I don't see what would constitute "much harder" for you, I see this everywhere in mainstream web.
>>8153
I thought the second pic was a cat from the thumbnail.