>>2378
There was a furry thread on trashcan /y2k/ that I've seen and there is something that kept returning to my thoughts:
A anon said:
__
"The general culture is also much more pornified, without any pretense of modesty or chastity. You could see the beginnings of this in the 1990s and early 2000s but it was still small and the mainstream culture still attempted to hold down modesty (...). Now dominant tastemakers actively shame any questioning of open sexuality. Everything is lewder.
This extends to characters of all kinds of well. Lewd character fanart of all stripes is produced, shared openly, celebrated, and very accessible. Where once porn with characters was subversive, it's downright routine today.
Now add to this the reification of furries. (...). In the 1990s and early 2000s, anthro characters were still regarded by the mainstream neutrally - they could be used as cute mascots, or animated characters, or some other use that took advantage of their animal-like features. If anything, they were partially reified as being "for kids" because of their strong associations with Disney and cartoons. But you could draw a cute anthro character and have it be just that: An anthro character, or a "funny animal" as they used to be called.
Thanks to two decades of semi-open furry fandom, greater Web/Internet access, all combined with a general loss of innocence mentioned above, anthro characters have reified among post-GenX people to denote "a furry" with all the connotations of the furry fandom's porniness. It's in the culture, the signposts are there, furries aren't a secret. If you draw an anthro character now, it's called a "furry" and the relationship between it and furry fandom has calcified. Anyone learning to draw anthro characters won't be learning from Warner Brothers cels, Disney stills, or mascots - they'll be learning directly from the furry fandom's considerable body of work. That in turn will influence their developing style, baking less innocent elements into their final works.
(...)
What I think this all means is that those who might otherwise draw the kind of "innocent" anthro that anon remembers... won't. Draw an innocent furry character and everyone'll assume you fap to fuckin' foxes anyway, and if you produce a good enough character design eventually someone else will draw them with their bits out.
Put the general loss of innocence together with the reification of furries, and you have the present situation. Everything is pornier now, and furries are especially pornier because they filter out those who might kick back and try to re-innocentise them."
__
Besides this board being aimed towards kemono specifically, this also applies. Although you can argue that Christianity is the 3rd bigger religion in Japan, the japanese can be generally described as being superstitious more than actually religious.
The general idea of modesty (or lack thereof in the modern world) leads to the re-signification of eroticism into vulgarity, leaving the exaltation of the body in a transcendent way behind in favor of pornography.
That being said, I can't be a moralist and label all characters with somewhat "big" proportions as being literal porn, but what most (at least normie) anime and manga produce are media, as the quote says, more sexualized (I mean characters created on the sole purpose of being hot). This is a complex matter because it's possible to produce this in such a way that recalls the original meaning of eroticism, in a dignified way so to speak, someone commented on Ogure Ito's work as a example of that idea.
Anyways, sorry for the wall of text but I hope that you could get my idea, staying late at night leads to this types of thoughts. I'm the anon from the art thread (the one from the siamese cat oc!). I've been reconsiderating lots of things regarding my drawings and general lifestyle due to a past porn addiction, I was never religious but recently I started to study, trying to understand better Christianity and myself. Maybe I will make a small hiatus and reconsider my art and what I want it to really be, maybe having this thinking in the week of Corpus Christi is a sign...
Have this picture that I saw while reading on Saint Christopher: