>>41066 Looked them up in wikipedia and my guess was pretty spot on. >Selkies are mythological creatures that can shapeshift between seal and human forms by removing or putting on their seal skin. They feature prominently in the oral traditions and mythology of various cultures, especially those of Celtic and Norse origin. The term "selkie" derives from the Scots word for "seal", and is also spelled as silkies, sylkies, or selchies. Selkies are sometimes referred to as selkie folk (Scots: selkie fowk), meaning "seal folk" >Selkies have a dual nature: they can be friendly and helpful to humans, but they can also be dangerous and vengeful. Selkies are often depicted as attractive and seductive in human form, and many stories involve selkies having romantic or sexual relationships with humans, sometimes resulting in children. Selkies can also be coerced or tricked into marrying humans, usually by someone who steals and hides their seal skin, preventing them from returning to the sea. Such marriages are often unhappy, as the selkie always longs for the sea and may eventually escape if they find their skin. So yeah, they are like that from the beginning, no need for husband.

I finally finished. The profile pictures not being representative and even the size descriptions not meaning much forced me to think about things a lot. Girls aren't sorted within their tiers, and for the sorter I treated kamaitachi A, B, and C as one monster since they're a package deal and mentally filed both youko and inari under "kitsune." I didn't let myself use the tie button. If I did the sorter again I'd probably get slightly different results, so don't mind the absolute sorting TOO much. I also really had to force myself not to think too much and just go with my gut or I never would've finished, the sorter is tough.

>>41141 >filed both youko and inari under "kitsune." You probably shouldn't. Inari and Youko have distinct vibes. The personality and appearance might be variable, but ultimately the profile dictates a determining force in the species personality overall, so you should still weigh them as if they were mostly the profile, even if you can imagine an individual that's the total opposite.

>>41147 >You probably shouldn't I don't see any point. At least the English community rarely bothers differentiating between the two and if the only difference between them is "vibes" when encyclopedia entries don't hard code a girl's vibes (or many other things), calling them different monsters is just sophistry. They're a skill issue apart. Not like I'd bother redoing all of that again for a minor difference anyway. Foxes will remain foxes in my mind.

There's my list! It's funny how the Kobold doesn't have a image though

>>57906 This guy wants to fuck a turtle!

I didn't do everyone, not autistic enough for that

>>59624 You definitely have a type yes. Also vampires being in the bottom is very funny. Deems in meh is somewhat strange.

>>59631 Demons are sneaky enslavers, they first tempt you with all sorts of pleasure and boons but then they make you sign a ToS that practically enslaves you forever. They're kinda like Bill Gates. Myeh

>>59639 It's not that bad, and you can always change the terms of the contract before you sign it. They can't force you to sign it, and 9 times out of ten it's just some kinky marriage contract.

>>59639 >kinda like Bill Gates I think that would be danuki. >create OS >make it most popular desktop OS >software devs make programs almost exclusively for that OS >people are kinda forced to run that OS is they want their pc to be useful >sell millions of copies worldwide and collect shitloads of money >years later, multimegabit internet connection appears >realize you can spy on people and sell that data to anyone including the monsters in the government >normalize telemetry though convincing ppl you aren't interested in an average user's mundane activities (you actually are and this is the reason why you have telemetry, in the first place) >convince people that cloud file storage is their friend while collecting their information >now that you have a shitload of information, you can search through your database whenever you need to find something on someone >next, simple. use that information to stalk the target/harass them/manipulate them into being massively screwed >many powerful individuals and organizations pay you $$$ for that data so they could screw targeted men like you do >your money & power counter: over 9000000

>>59642 That's why demons are in average. Vampires and dark elves, for example, are declaratively abusive and domineering - they go straight into incinerator. Demons are so-so, they might give you total domination or they might pamper you to the extreme. Also they look really hot on the art.

My ranking criteria must've changed half a dozen times doing this. Top 50 or so are all fine

>>63584 Man, what a random mix...

>>63584 >>63758 Seems like mostly "big girls" on the top ranks, a mix of cuddly and strong/buff. The simple succ as the top 2 is definitely quite the surprise.

>>63760 ain't nothing wrong with a simple succ or her magical might

Whew, finally did it, just a reminder that it does not very accurately represent my views, for example I'd place malef dragons above regular ones, both of them above dhampirs and dhampirs above pretty much everyone else minus the spirits, etc.

>>63771 >The image you are requesting does not or is no longer availa imgur.com KC gets crazier with his designs each day. Jokes aside, you seem to like very agressive mamono. And if the sorter isn't very accurate to your actual likes, i'd recomend you do the sorter instead. It's a lot quicker, and you get a constant overview of your rankings instead of guessing where you've positioned who and why.

>>63760 >The simple succ as the top 2 is definitely quite the surprise. She seems nice, better than all the "foreverial having sex and loving it" ones and outright emasculators, like someone you could softly embrace and lay your head on her chest somedays and then pick her up and fuck her through the wall on others.

>>63774 The funniest part is that seems to be the Wendigo profile lol. They don't show themselves to you until you're their husband candidate

>>63795 >beter than all the "foreverial having sex and loving it" ones and outright emasculators Brother, you can't be this naive.

>>63795 >emasculators >it's the mge You were never meant to be the alpha chad, anyways.

>>63899 I don't care if they're mostly just toppings for vanilla, i want my rainbow sprinkles and big chunks of peanut butter cup, maybe a bit of black sclera fudge sauce, not almonds or boba or chili crisp Unless you're implying that some of my high ranks have those kind in which case, meh, there's some implied back and forth unlike amazoness where it'd get obnoxious.

LOL you fagets, nothing's wrong with succubi. They're nothing special but, they're likable enough. Also he seems like somebody who likes powerhouse girls and succubi can be quite powerful.

>>64110 >LOL you fagets, nothing's wrong with succubi

Well, the sorter isn't really accurate. A lot of monsters are placed way too low (Ryus should be at least at 30+, Shogs are WAY too low etc.) Also I've accidentally fucked up Undine. She should be in 35+. mah bad

>>64449 Imagine liking dragons.

>>64619 Why not?

>>64449 What's wrong with the Anubis? Otherwise nice one, I agree with you a lot

>>65039 It was a reference anon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagine_Dragons

>>64449 >vampires and eldritch abominations go into incinerator >strong aggressive girls are on top of the world My kind of tier list.

>>64112 She's right, you know.

oh wow it's hard to pick a favourite

>>67308 u screwed it up man

>>67308 Blink twice if you are being held hostage.

>>16207 Shit, best laugh I've had from here lately

Omitted a few of them, because I don't particularly care about them. Also Varies means they're not all bad/good, but mostly they are in that category.

It just turns out that I can't give a definite rank to most of them.

>>93747 Mixed opinion on inari? They're pretty simple and widely appealing, so i'm curious as to what the mixed part is.

>>93747 Interesting how you missed Lamias, they're popular enough (thx Alice the 16th) so you're just bound to have an opinion of them.

>>93752 They're a bit too conservative for my tastes, also foxes are known schemers. >>94080 Believe it or not, I simply don't have an opinion regarding Lamias.

Alrighty! First tier list I've ever made on anything ever. Good use time, too.

>>94915 Damn, genuine subhuman taste. Good bait.

>>94915 Is it randomly generated?

Man, this sorter is a pain in the ass. After halfway through I just started clicking Tie every time I couldn't say this or the other way in a few seconds. I don't think it's very accurate, too.

>>95157 God damnit, how autistic is the average capy poster? I don't even know half these mamono, let alone have an opinion about them.

>>95362 If anything i think these are newbies. Anyone who was here on the first move already did the sorters .>>95157 Kej on nope is a bit strange. Guess you aren't a big fan of the hair?

>>95735 Took me a while to figure who is that "Kej". They're creepy and their style is a literal whore, so it's a nope.

Well it's... fairly close, but still there are hilarious mistakes. Somehow high orcs got outranked by the fucking vampires and a bunch of mutational failures, even though I'd place them above regular ones. Valkyries are a bit too high, not the dark ones but regulars. Echidnas stand way too high, above inari and wyverns while they should be somewhere at 50s.

Oh, and elves standing on the same level as gremlins is total bullshit. Grems belong higher and the elves go down with the rest of tsundere squad.