>>10459
first, yes, even if that was all she had going for her.
But she's also a doll, remember. So literally non-human (or even organic).
>>10461
Extra arms and blue skin are more "monstrous" than the cosplay tier bs that are elf ears. Don't even get me started on vampires.
But we can think about some types of "monster" girls
-monsters in name only, indistinguishable from normal women
-monsters only sometimes (like a transformation), otherwise indistinguishable
-cheap cosplay tier (elf ears, tail+animal ears, succs, angels, etc)
-different skin color
-skin color plus cosplay tier
-advanced cosplay tier/proper monster girl (ears, tail + non human legs, maybe also paws, some sort of claws(e.g. Felicia from Darkstalkers))
-half human (lamia, centaurs, etc)
-less than half human (I dunno from the top of my head, prolly some borderline furry)
Then there's also
-androids/golems/dolls/robots
-ghosts
-zombies
-skeletons
Most monster girls are some sort of animal-human hybrid, so Ranni and hunter's doll would be in the second "magical" category. Also most popular monster girls seem to be the cheap cosplay tier (all those kemonomimis and other vanilla bs).
Draw the "this is where mongirls begin" line where you want, I don't care much, I just call out cosplay tier fuckers as boring vanilla losers.