>>7846
>I don't exactly get what you're trying to say
I meant that r34 is worse than following their tag definitions than exhentai, the exhentai gallery had pretty damn big breasts even if not technically "gigantic"
>And there's a reason most sites have very few to none pictures of breasts that big: Very few people like breasts of those sizes.
Danbooru has 7.4k images in their biggest tits tag ("gigantic_breasts"), the real reason is that the sites have slightly diverging classification.
>Lastly, are you seriously telling me that you would not consider breasts that are larger than a girls torso each as hyper breasts?
You got me there, I got fixated on shitting on r34 fags so much that I didn't realize their definition was more or less my own, I did not think of the implications of saying that hyper means at least as big as rest of the body.
There's a reason I prefer to count on people's common sense and I needlessly got tied up in a pointless semantics argument caused by
>>7832 playing backseat mod. Next time I'll delete such posts right away and you'll know something is too big if I spoiler it, like I did with
>>7037
So, the corrected definition for hyper breasts here would be "noticeably bigger than the girl's torso". I add "noticeably" because this thread needs a bit of leeway.
Which means
>>7831 is very much okay and the pic you posted now gets spoilered.
Any more talk regarding the rules is for the board meta thread, that's enough derailing.