>>13359
>I like things how they are
If I had a guarantee we would have at least the current levels of activity, I'd be be fine with that too. But this site's activity trend is almost a sine wave and few months ago I was seriously considering throwing the towel with my IRL situation going to shit not helping either. And before that we had similar up and down last year and between that lesser cycles I can't be arsed to analyze on charts. It might as well become almost dead again in 2 or 3 months, who knows.
Point is, one thing lots of anons seem to forget is that I don't have the luxury of being able to just take a break for some months, then come back and go
>oh neat, this place is still around
have some fun and then leave again, I have to keep the lights on through the droughts and I need to make sure there is long-term solution for this place rather than pray things will get better eventually, because there's no way to tell when a pit in activity is actually the final one that leads into death spiral. So I'm looking for a way to smooth out the sinusoid by getting more constant visibility, which brought us to the current discussion.
>server costs are a concern
They aren't, the time/effort I put in is vastly more significant than the server bills, it's just one of the things that add up.